March 25, 2012
Ms. Pushpa Bhusal
I am delighted to learn that you do agree me; quite a few other CAs representing your party and some from UML fail to understand my sentiments. I am not associated with any party and I don’t base my views on which party is doing what.
I comment on the basis of whether Nepal’s economy and people of Nepal benefit or not. This project built for the internal consumption of Nepal will help our motherland in industrialization which will lead to employment generation enabling the youth to stay home instead of going abroad just to be exploited financially and even sexually. Previous incarnation of west seti contravened Article 156 of constitution and infringed upon the right of the CA.
Even now I am against Upper Karnali and Arun III projects for two reasons. The agreements contravene Article 156 and infringes upon the right of CA.
We are organizing an interaction program tomorrow at Bhojan Griha from 10:45 to 13:00 hrs. We invite you to the program. I look forward to meet you if you could spare some time.
With best regards,
Ratna Sansar Shrestha, FCA
Senior Water Resource Analyst
From: pushpa bhusal [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 8:20
Subject: RE: West Seti getting dragged into controversy unnecessarily
you have rightly pointed about the west seti project. we do agree in you concern. this is good opportunity to nepal to get energy for we all citizen. as well as this is good opportunity to our government to do another agreement with others and beware of such kinds of the condition.
thankyou for you intellectual contribution regarding these issuse.
pushpa bhusal, CA Member
Subject: FW: West Seti getting dragged into controversy unnecessarily
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:59:15 +0545
West Seti is getting dragged into controversy again. However, this time it is for different/wrong reasons.