August 8, 2012
To: Prof. Dr. Mohan Lohani'
Cc: Surya Dhungel; Rajendra Dahal; Hari Sharma; Lalit Basnet
Dear Prof Lohani
I refrained from responding to your email right away as I wanted to see if the president’s initiative will fructify, as I was apprehensive that I would be branded skeptic had I articulated my thought before the meeting took place. In my considered opinion what was done is too little too late. We are in full agreement as, is generally, usual.
We are being treated to unfolding drama in this respect. UML’ student wing is in the street demanding care taker PM”s resignation. People aren’t even clear as to constitutional position of care taker government. It will be highly embarrassing if even president is awaiting the resignation. Otherwise, why hasn’t he conformed with the provision of Article 38(1) of the constitution.
Incidentally, I am getting admitted in Norvic Hospital today for a surgery to “repair” incisional hernia. I am given to understand that the surgery will be performed sometime in the afternoon.
नमरी बाँचे, कालले साँचे, फेरि भेटौंला
With best regards,
Ratna Sansar Shrestha, FCA
Senior Water Resource Analyst
From: Mohan Lohani [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Monday, August 6, 2012 5:53
To: Ratna Sansar Shrestha
Subject: All parties' meetings at the President's office
Dear Ratna Sansarji,
The President yesterday only called upon the parties to forge consensus which is a far cry in the present context.Looks this imbroglio will linger on indefinitelly.Surya Dhungel, President's legal adviser,was defending the President's initiative to achieve a breakthrough.
All the best ,